Your Ad Here

iPhone 4 antenna woes contextualized by dude in the know

It’s the ultimate of ironies that Apple’s externalized antenna array in the iPhone 4 — hoped (and hyped up) to finally give us a phone every bit as good the rest of the device — has become the cause of most rancor in the immediate aftermath of the handset’s release. This morning you’ll be rubbing both sleep and disbelief out of your eyes as you read that Apple’s response to some people’s reception problems with the 4 is to hold it differently. But, before we start ostracizing Apple as the singular offender here, let’s hear from a man in the know.

Spencer Webb runs AntennaSys, a company that designs tailormade RF solutions, and has himself worked on making quad-band transceivers for AT&T. As he tells it, almost all phone makers have now transitioned to locating their antennae at the bottom of the phones. This has been in order to move radio wave emissions away from the head (a shortcoming that a top-mounted aerial would incur), which the FCC has been quite demanding about with its SAR standards –

The iPhone 4, however, moved the antenna action from the back of the phone to the sides. This probably improves the isotropy of the radiation pattern, but only when the phone is suspended magically in air.

Another great point made here is that testing done both by the Federales and mobile carriers might include the head, but never accounts for the presence of the person’s hand. Thus, although a phone’s antenna could test very well, it might suffer from such issues as those experienced with the iPhone 4. Mind you, this still seems like an assembly (rather than design) problem to us, since most of our editors haven’t had any reception worries and we in fact saw improved performance on that front while conducting our review testing. Spencer himself has decided to buy the phone knowing full well about this potential limitation, and concludes on the note that “sometimes an antenna that’s not great, but good enough, is good enough.”

iPhone 4 antenna woes contextualized by dude in the know originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:47:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink fmanjoo (Twitter)  |  sourceAntennaSys  | Email this | Comments

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • PDF
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • RSS

This post is tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply





  • Google, Microsoft and Netflix want DRM-like encryption in HTML5Google, Microsoft and Netflix want DRM-like encryption in HTML5

    HTML5 is meant to set the internet free. Free to deliver and shape online media in any web browser. However, several of the standard's greatest champions like to have the ability to restrict the usage of and tags through encrypted media extensions. A draft proposal have been submitted by Google, Microsoft, and Netflix to the W3C -- the curators of HTML5 -- to feature encrypted… »
  • MetroPCS Q4 results are in: increased revenue, slowing growthMetroPCS Q4 results are in: increased revenue, slowing growth

    The nation's fifth largest wireless provider -- MetroPCS -- has checked in with its Q4 2011 financials, and typically, the corporate looks to be doing quite well. Metro reported $1.2 billion in consolidated quarterly revenues and $362 million in earnings, a rise of 16% and 15% compared to the fourth quarter of 2010. a couple of other positive vitals: average revenue per user (ARPU)… »

Categories

Subscribe

Enter your email address: