Why an iPod Touch With Cameras Can be a Serial Killer [Ipod Touch]

A new iPod touch with the iPhone 4 ‘s dual cameras-specifically its awesome 5-megapixel shooter -is more than just another iPod touch. It’s a true killer gadget.

A friend of mine is moving to France for a year. Her contract with Verizon is up for renewal. She’s not a really perfect dweeb, but she was considering getting a respectable Android phone-the Incredible, or Droid X-and simply running it on Wi-Fi, using it as her ultra pocketable computer for music, web browsing, Facebook, email and importantly, a web-connected camera alongside an inexpensive pay-as-you-go phone for basic service over there. The Verizon salesperson inexplicably told that wouldn’t work it all. I told her it simply wouldn’t be fabulous. What she needs, really, is an iPod touch with the iPhone 4′s retina display and dual cameras.

Inexplicably, there’s never been a credible iPod touch competitor. The Zune HD doesn’t run apps (the handful it’s got don’t count), so it’s limited in what it could actually do-it’s simply a terrific music player. Android continues to be a miserable place to be in relation to media, and on top of that, all the Android ” tablets” had been thoroughly mediocre. There’s nothing accessible that’s remotely like the iPod touch. And obviously, there’s a demand for it, since it’s the simplest iPod whose sales are still growing.

An iPod touch with the iPhone 4′s remarkable-for-a-phone camera will be the gadget that’s effectively a ninja assassin squad against a full range of different middling gadgets. A 32GB model could be $300, assuming Apple keeps a similar pricing scheme as always. (They’re going to.) A FlipHD is bulkier, shoots a similar 720p video, and it’s about $150. The common cheapish point-and-shoot is around $150 too, and doesn’t shoot photos which can be significantly better inside the hands of a normie. An iPod touch with the iPhone 4′s excellent camera would replace both of them-with some superior capabilities, like easy uploading to Flickr or Facebook-while doing all the other things an iPod touch is awesome at for a minimal amount of extra scratch.

The camera app is less flexible than a dedicated camera, it really is true. There’s no white balance control, or exposure compensation, or other advanced controls you’d find on even middling point-and-shoots. But the folk who could replace their point-and-shoot with an iPod touch are the sort of folks who didn’t mess with that stuff anyway: They point. They shoot. And ideal imaging apps like Hipstamatic and Pano deliver the types of effects and fireworks the typical person is calling for in their photos. Even I’ve semi-replaced my S90 with my iPhone 4, for 90 percent of the short photos I take.

An iPod touch with a camera. It’s a robust proposition. The indisputable fact that it may replace a camera makes it that rather more powerful of a gadget, that so much more of a threat to everything else-because which means it really can replace everything in a manbag or purse but the phone-iPod, camera, notepad, gaming device, the list goes on. And it’s everything that’s great concerning the iPhone 4, but without the technological venereal disease that may be a two-year AT&T contract. It’s approachable, even to those that aren’t super tech savvy-they may be able to keep their simple, reliable phone on any carrier and use the iPod touch right inclusive of it. That’s a killer gadget.

Source

This post is tagged: ipod, killer, serial, touch