![The Washington Post Seems to Have Heard of this " Facebook" Site [Facebook]](http://nexgadget.com/images/The-Washington-Post-Seems-to-Have-Heard-of-this-Facebook-Site-Facebook_eeoit_0.jpeg)
A well-designed website need to be clear, peculiarly. No flashing GIFs (we miss you, 90s!), no obnoxious flash menus, no overwhelming lists of links. And heads up, WaPo website: it shouldn’t be blanketed in insanely redundant Facebook sharing buttons.
![The Washington Post Seems to Have Heard of this " Facebook" Site [Facebook]](http://nexgadget.com/images/The-Washington-Post-Seems-to-Have-Heard-of-this-Facebook-Site-Facebook_eeoit_1.jpeg)
SHARE ME! LIKE ME! LINK ME! We get it. Enough. One or two buttons should suffice. We understand how to place things on Facebook if we wish to. One sharp-eyed BuzzFeed contributor spotted not one, not five, not eight, but twelve instances of Facebook’s ubiquity. Social media sharing is cool-but designing your newspaper like Zuckerberg’s pin cushion seriously is not. And as a reader, is basically, really annoying. [ BuzzFeed ]
OMAP 5′s dual A15 cores wipe the ground with four A9s in browsing benchmark
The winners of the 2011 Engadget Awards — Readers’ Choice
