Citizens recording their public interactions with police sure appears like the type of thing that may prevent corruption, harassment and bad behavior by cops. Just don’t do it in Illinois, where it’s punishable by up to 15 years in prison .
Sixty-year-old Chicago artist Christopher Drew is currently facing an eavesdropping charge because he recorded his arrest for ” selling art without a permit.” Eavesdropping-that’s, recording conversations, either public or private, without universal consent-is a felony in Illinois, and Drew could face 15 years in prison.
So could Tiawanda Moore, a 20-year-old former stripper who recorded a conversation she had with two Internal Affairs officers about a third police officer whom she was accusing of harassment :
Ms. Moore said the investigators tried to chat her out of filing a complaint, saying the officer had a positive record and that they may ” guarantee” that he doesn’t bother her again.
” They maintain giving her the run-around, basically looking to discourage her from making a report,” [her lawyer Robert] Johnson said. ” Finally, she decides to record them on her cellphone to indicate how they’re not helping her.”
The investigators discovered that she was recording them and she or he was arrested and charged with two counts of eavesdropping.
Police officers, meanwhile, are allowed to record civilians ” in private or public.”
The ACLU filed a lawsuit over the eavesdropping law inside the wake of ” several” arrests of folks who attempted to record conversations with law enforcement officials. It was dismissed by a federal judge earlier this month, but they plan to appeal.
The Fraternal Order of Police, meanwhile, fully supports this application of the eavesdropping law. Its president, Mark Donahue, told the Chicago News Cooperative that being recorded ” can affect how an officer does his job in the street.” No duh, Mark.
[ NYT ; image via Shutterstock]
FCC thinks ISPs should do a wiser job preventing fraud, theft
Robot navigates, reassembles truss structures



