Judge tells Oracle to rethink $2.6 billion claim against Google

The war between Google and Oracle is way from over, however the big G keeps racking up tiny victories in what are admittedly modest battles. Now the Redwood Shores-based company was told to return to the drafting board with its damages report. Originally Oracle sought $2.6 billion, but its theories were largely dismissed and choose William Alsup suggested an alternate place to begin of approximately $100 million. The corporate still has a possibility to give a brand new report, person who will likely seek a lot more than the proposed $100 million, but things are looking increasingly tough for the claimant. It wasn’t all excellent news for Goog, though. While the judge told Oracle to narrow its focus from Android as an entire to simply specific infringing features , he did agree that related advertising revenue must be included within the theoretical royalty base. He also offered harsh criticism for what he viewed as its “brazen” disregard for intellectual property rights. The trial remains to be scheduled for October, so we must always have a far better idea of the way this entire thing will play out by Halloween.

Source

This post is tagged: advertising revenue, brazen disregard, drawing board, harsh criticism, intellectual property rights, judge william, redwood shores